Week 2.Montante. Theories of Development
Week 2. Theories of Development: Interpreting the Lifespan
Next is Erikson. He developed a psychosocial theory of
development that highlights the impact of social experiences on stages of human
development. He developed a theory of eight stages describing growth and change
throughout life, social interaction and conflicts that rises during different
stages of development. His eight stages are presented on page 32, table 2.1. By
comparing Freud and Erikson they both have the similar ideas, but yet are very
different. Based on the names of Freud stages compared to Erikson's eight stage
names, you could tell that Freud focuses on sexual interest as a driving forces
in development while Erikson cover age periods that extend more the age related
stages than what Freud describes.
Then we have Piaget who was a Swiss psychologist. He viewed
development as consisting of four distinct stages of mental demonstration that
individual pass through to their way into adulthood. His four stages are sensorimotor,
preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational. Piaget stated
that “we are able to form cognitive structures because we have inherited a
method of intellectual functioning that permits us to respond to our
environment” (pg. 34). Somewhat like Piaget, there is another psychologist names Vygotsky. He believed that children learn actively and through hands on experiences. He also suggested that parents, caregivers, peers and the culture were responsible for developing higher order functions. There are three fundamental themes that run through his work: the unique manner, the social origin of mind and the role of speech in cognitive development.
The next two are together in the sense that they focused on classical conditioning. This opens up to behaviorism. It is mostly focused with observable behavior rather that internal events like thinking and emotion. On page 39, it reads about Pavlov’s famous experiment in which the ringing of a bell was paired with food being presented to dogs. Skinner’s theory is operant conditioning. It is the use of consequences to alter or shape voluntary behavior or actions. He believed that the best way to understand behavior is to look at the causes of an action and its consequences. I remember back when I took psychology 101 and Skinner was the name I would never forget because operant conditioning made sense to me because of how true it was. One thing I remember was token economy because it rewards good behavior with tokens that can be exchanged for something desired. An example that most connect this with is at school; teachers give students a token when their behavior matches the desired behavior. This to me is true that it does happen and I did not think of it as anything unless I read Skinners theory.
Next we have Bandura and he is the chief architects of social learning theory, has stressed the potent influence of modeling on personality development (Bandura, 1997). People learn from one another by observation, imitation, and modeling. For me this is how I learn. For my job it is basically on hands learning. I learned by looking at my coworkers skills and then I applied them. I am an orthodontic assistant and for our skills it is not something to be taught by a book rather we show how to preform the work. I learned how to put in a wire for braces by observing the way my coworker did it.
Lastly we have Maslow. Maslow proposed that motivation is the result of a person’s attempt at fulling five basic needs: physiological (hunger and sleep), safety (security, protection, and freedom), love and belongingness (need of family and friends), esteem (as a person) and self-actualization on page 46; figure 2.5.
It was interesting reading everyone’s theory. It gets me
thinking how this would be applied to me and the future career I plan to go
into. I’ll be working with children and every day I would get to observed them
each as their own person. These theories can help me explain why and how kids
do the things they do and their reasoning for it. It also helped remind me how I
am developing now as a person and also as a mother.
Jaquelyn,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your post. I think you did an excellent job summarizing the difference between each theorist and how each individual came about their work. I liked how you connected Skinner with real life. I absolutely agree that good behavior is treated with reward especially in a school setting. As I progressed through school, students with good behavior were eventually rewarded either with an external or internal reward.
I think Bandura's theory is very relatable to every single person. Many people in this world are visual learners where once they watch someone do something one time, they start learning from it. Depending on the individual, they may catch on after one time seeing it or it may take them a few times to see what is going on to learn it. Overall, I do think observation is very important no matter what job someone is doing. Do you think this applies to all ages? When I think about it, newborns and young children don't necessarily use speech so they use imitation techniques to mock what they see in life. Their cognitive processing is not as developed as a young adult so they use their actions more. I also believe adults have an influence on children because young kids are watching adults and they are learning from their actions and movements and are more inclined to repeat those actions they constantly see.
I like how you connected this chapter to your personal life as well. My future career is going to be a teacher which is highly revolved around these theories and how kids react mentally, socially, and emotionally as they develop.
Jaquelyn,
ReplyDeleteI like that you made connections you made between Skinner’s theory of reinforcement and the token economy system used in education as a way to modify students’ behavior. This also came to my mind when reading this section of the textbook. In my experience, token economies work very well for students with ADHD. The immediate reinforcement provided is able to effectively create certain patterns of behavior for this population of students. When I have seen these systems implemented for students with ADHD, I also did not immediately think of behavioral theory and Skinner’s work. This chapter seemed to have reminded both of us about the importance of the work of researchers like him and how it affects the way we educate students even today! Overall, I really enjoyed reading your personal reaction to this section of the text and think it’s interesting that we both connected his work with the same behavioral management system.
- Alicia
hi!
ReplyDeleteWell put blog. Very insightful and organized.
You first mention Freud. I feel that although a lot of what he said was interesting and made sense I feel he did not explain development well enough. He felt a child's personality is set on stone by the age of five. I feel that is not correct. A five year old is still very young and a lot of things can happen in their lives that can change who they are, whether its something traumatic or change of scenery.
I like how you use Bandura's logic in comparison to your job. He did mention that a child develops through hands on. This I feel is true for many aspects of life and works at any age. Everything we learn is through doing it ourselves. We have to do something ourselves to learn no matter how many mistakes we might make.
Overall, all their findings explain development well.